Friday, June 08, 2007

Next Finger Building Please Stand Up: Quadriad's Williamsburg Project Advances

If you thought that the proposal by Quadriad Development to build highrises in low-rise neighborhoods--including ones that have been downzoned--was so far fetched that it was a non-starter, think again. The 24-story tower proposed at the corner of N. 3rd and Berry in Williamsburg took a small step forward with a vote in its favor by the Land Use Committee of Community Board 1. The thumbs up came as a shock to some residents, who told us they were surprised by the outcome. The voting process was odd, with the project being defeated, and then, approved when a committee member arrived after the vote had been taken and cast a deciding vote in favor of the project. The plan calls for a project combining a 5-story building with 75 units and a 24-story building.

Quadriad includes among its executives former U.S. Rep. and Bronx Borough President Herman Badillo, who ran for mayor five times, making it as far as a runoff election against Abraham Beame. One of the development partners is Joe Sitt's Thor Equities.

The property is in the part of Williamsburg that was downzoned in 2005 in return for allowing highrise waterfront development. At that time, city officials argued they were protecting the low-rise character of "inland" blocks by allowing buildings up to 40 stories tall on the waterfront.

While Quadriad is looking to upzone a downzoned Williamsburg property, it is also proposing a new zoning classification citywide called R6AF, (the "AF" stands for affordable) which would create tremendous density bonuses for a project that would include one-third affordable housing. Williamsburg activist Phil DePaolo calls it "the Mother of All Density Bonuses." In Williamsburg, for instance, it would result in a building quadruple the current allowable height.

The Quadriad project has also applied for the 421a developer tax break. Interestingly, the company is expected to rush to create a foundation for the project before the end of the year so that it can qualify for the tax break without having any requirement to build affordable housing. The building site would fall under a revision to the 421a program requiring 25 percent affordable housing in return for the tax break in neighborhoods like Williamsburg.

Quadriad is also ultimately looking to develop at least six other parcels from N. 3rd to N. 5th Streets between Berry and Kent Avenues with highrises, as well as two others, one of which may be between N. 7th Street and Metropolitan Avenue near the BQE. The company has also set its sights on Coney Island Avenue in southern Brooklyn. The company wants to propose the zoning formula citywide for sites that are a minimum of 40,000 square feet.

The full Community Board still has to vote on the project, but there is a chance it could be approved. "I'm very worried about it," said Mr. DePaolo, who is an advocate of affordable housing, but deeply critical of the methods the city has tried using in Williamsburg and Greenpoint. "We could end up making the same mistake twice." Mr. DePaolo's studies of the neighborhood show that the 2005 rezoning has only produced nine units of affordable housing away from the waterfront. There is also a very in-depth and intelligent analysis of the proposal at Brooklyn 11211 that suggests that if it approves the proposal, "CB1 will have literally given away the store, and in the process will have thrown out all of the good of the upland rezoning for Williamsburg and Greenpoint."

The zoning change would ultimately have to be approved by the City Council.

Labels: ,

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

More under the table dealings between the city's and community's elected/appointed officals and the developers....How much money and quid pro quo is been passed about by the developers and city offials?

Further I am wonder what the Land Use Commitee of Community Board 1 (CB1) is thinking about when they are voting to allow even more new people to pay for new condos inside what would be the lethal plume area set off by a fire/explotion at Radiac involving its hazardous chemical storage....and wer are even talking the other radioactive waste storage risks! How is anyone in City or State gov signing off on ANY new development with the Plume Area and w/in a mile radius of Radiac? ....And remember the City closed the fire house in Northside that was trained for Hazard responses! What is the City/State doing? This is gross negligence.
------------------------
Here's some verbiage from a document prepared by the Rezoning Task Force of Community Board 1 during the Greenpoint/Williamsburg rezoning debate in 2005:

Radiac, at Kent Avenue and S. 1st Street, serves as a transfer station for both hazardous chemicals and low-level radioactive waste. Because of the spatial inadequacies of the footprint of the facility, Radiac often operates with its doors open during loading/unloading of hazardous chemical and radioactive waste. A Molotov cocktail or a gunshot could set off a calamitous event. Engine Co. 212 was located ten blocks from Radiac and could have handled a fire rapidly enough to prevent a meltdown of the low-level nuclear waste (the EPA standard of cleanup of Radioactive events could lead to a 50-year evacuation and quarantine of Williamsburg and parts of Manhattan or Queens, depending on wind direction). This one facility stores up to critical mass of radioactive waste and flammable liquids, reactives, oxidizers, and explosives (up to 15,000 total gallons of hazardous chemical waste)...

If that's not enough to make a bite of lunch go down your windpipe, here's a bit more background color from an article in Block Magazine a while back:

That inventory, and charges that Radiac has been lax in the care and security of the chemicals, has residents and neighborhood activists pining for a relocation of the business to a less densely populated area. An accident in Radiac could easily trigger one of the worst environmental disasters New York City has ever seen, says Sean Nagle, the health and research director of activist organization El Puente’s Community Health and Education Institute...

10:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sounds good to me. People complain about the dearth of affordable housing, and also about anything taller than 6 floors. Well, you can't have it both ways. If you only want 6 floors, it will be market rate, if you want affordable, it's going to have to be larger.

Quite the ultimatum indeed. If they vote against affordable housing, we will know their true aim from the beginning was just stopping tall buildings. (24 stories is not even tall, this is NYC folks)

4:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The comemt just above wreaks of the smell of the developer team who wrote it. Tell the truth-- the developers here are overtly trying to throw out the 197 plan that the williamsburg commuunity groups put togther and pushed for NOT the developers plan. Furthermore, the developers across the neighborhood are trying to con the neighborhood by building the majority of their affordable housing in Brooklyn BUT NOT in Wiliamsburg to service the people here. Finally, if the developers had any sincere intents they would have accepted the community's original intent of low rise on the water and putting the high rises back by the BQE where most of the floors would have your precious "river view" and the lower flows would still have affordable hosuing as well...BUT NO the developers want to push out everyone here and turn this meighborhood in to one color - WHITE and one income- High and "mall" the rest of it like the developers love to do in the burbs they all live in. STOP Lying. Your developlemnt group is full of crap...
And what are you gonna do when the Stock and RE Mkt crash and you have stuck with your half built project? When they can 20% of WS amd a chunck of Madison ave and new media types b/c the advertising mkt falls with the Stock Mkt then what? Will you stick the city with your shit buildings? and they can thrn turn then into affordable housing aftr you back out?

11:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home